Subject | Re: [firebird-php] Firebird, PHP on CentOS 5 again |
---|---|
Author | Lester Caine |
Post date | 2009-05-20T05:16:49Z |
Anderson Farias wrote:
The point here is that where Firebird has progressed to being
'supported' by a distribution, the package may be totally screwed up
with respect to a 'standard' FB install - as demonstrated by Fedora
I've just found a copy of the FHS rules, and actually it is quite clear
... /opt SHOULD be used for additional software and each package should
be contained in it's own tree below /opt ... FHS simply does not provide
any rules as to why /usr should be used instead of /opt for additional
packages over those required by the kernel :( So we get the usual crap
of each distribution can claim to be compliant as there are no actual
rules set down in the standard TO follow!
Actually - LOCALLY installed software should be in /usr/local/ but
then isn't ALL software installed locally?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
> Hi,But only if YOU installed it using the FB installation.
>
>> well thouse are the FHS rules and i guess Fedora implements them
>> this is why sometimes is easy to move from one Linux to another
>> you know that apache config must be somewhere in /etc/httpd*
>
> I find very easy to move from one distro to another with FB setup. It's
> aways there on /opt/firebird no matter the distro ;-)
The point here is that where Firebird has progressed to being
'supported' by a distribution, the package may be totally screwed up
with respect to a 'standard' FB install - as demonstrated by Fedora
I've just found a copy of the FHS rules, and actually it is quite clear
... /opt SHOULD be used for additional software and each package should
be contained in it's own tree below /opt ... FHS simply does not provide
any rules as to why /usr should be used instead of /opt for additional
packages over those required by the kernel :( So we get the usual crap
of each distribution can claim to be compliant as there are no actual
rules set down in the standard TO follow!
Actually - LOCALLY installed software should be in /usr/local/ but
then isn't ALL software installed locally?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php