Alan McDonald wrote:

>>ADOdb!
>>Someone had simply disabled transactions altogether to get things
>>to work ;)
>>This has a StartTrans() and CompleteTrans() which work very nicely in
>>wrapping the transaction (and 'emulating' transactions where the
>>database does not support them), and switching the query to use the
>>transactionID. In fact everything works nicely - except that the
>>original default Transaction does not see any changes made in the inner
>>transactions.
>>I have a fix for the immediate problem, which is just to read the new
>>data before completing the transaction, but it seems that there IS
>>something missing by way of a 'Refresh', which I can emulate by closing
>>and re-opening the connection :(
>>
>>--
>>Lester Caine
>
> hmmm, ezSQL doesn't have this problem :-)

So how does it get round it?
The 'problem' is with the ibase_ transactions ;)

--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services