Subject | RE: [firebird-php] Win2003 Vs Win2k performance?? |
---|---|
Author | Alan McDonald |
Post date | 2004-02-24T10:51:14Z |
thanks Lester
I must say that the php newsgroups (NEWS.PHP.NET) are pretty piss poor when
it comes to offering support
Are there any other resources (NGs) which are better? It appears that
php/interbase is a fairly low use environment but I would have thought
php/windows is a fiarly high traffic area but maybe not
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: Lester Caine [mailto:lester@...]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 6:54 PM
To: firebird-php@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [firebird-php] Win2003 Vs Win2k performance??
Alan McDonald wrote:
problems. No plans to even look at W2003, new sites are
getting Linux :)
out, and having to reloaded - i.e. what is the memory
situation.
I don't touch IIS either, Apache2 and PHP4 work fine with
FB1.0 and FB1.5, with a reasonable performance improvement
from 1.5, but nothing that I have 'bench marked'. Old stuff
will stay FB1.0, and all new stuff has only been FB1.5, so
real comparison is not practical ;)
--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-php/
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
firebird-php-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I must say that the php newsgroups (NEWS.PHP.NET) are pretty piss poor when
it comes to offering support
Are there any other resources (NGs) which are better? It appears that
php/interbase is a fairly low use environment but I would have thought
php/windows is a fiarly high traffic area but maybe not
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: Lester Caine [mailto:lester@...]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 6:54 PM
To: firebird-php@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [firebird-php] Win2003 Vs Win2k performance??
Alan McDonald wrote:
> I have my dev machine on Win2003 Server and my production on Win2KServer.
> Does anyone know of a setting on the win2K env which would cause it tominutes
> perform very slowly? After letting the app ly dormant for only a few
> and then requesting a new page, the app is very slow to respond, thenit's
> fine for the next few pages, then if you stop for a minute or so andrequest
> another page, you get the same sluggish response. This does not occur onWhere I am using Windows it's W2k, and I am not seeing any
> win2003 server.
problems. No plans to even look at W2003, new sites are
getting Linux :)
> Is there a setting I have missed perhaps?It does sound like a caching 'problem'. Is it being paged
> is it IIS5 Vs IIS6? or something else?
out, and having to reloaded - i.e. what is the memory
situation.
I don't touch IIS either, Apache2 and PHP4 work fine with
FB1.0 and FB1.5, with a reasonable performance improvement
from 1.5, but nothing that I have 'bench marked'. Old stuff
will stay FB1.0, and all new stuff has only been FB1.5, so
real comparison is not practical ;)
--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-php/
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
firebird-php-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]