Subject | Re: [firebird-php] Win2003 Vs Win2k performance?? |
---|---|
Author | Lester Caine |
Post date | 2004-02-24T07:54:12Z |
Alan McDonald wrote:
problems. No plans to even look at W2003, new sites are
getting Linux :)
out, and having to reloaded - i.e. what is the memory
situation.
I don't touch IIS either, Apache2 and PHP4 work fine with
FB1.0 and FB1.5, with a reasonable performance improvement
from 1.5, but nothing that I have 'bench marked'. Old stuff
will stay FB1.0, and all new stuff has only been FB1.5, so
real comparison is not practical ;)
--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services
> I have my dev machine on Win2003 Server and my production on Win2K Server.Where I am using Windows it's W2k, and I am not seeing any
> Does anyone know of a setting on the win2K env which would cause it to
> perform very slowly? After letting the app ly dormant for only a few minutes
> and then requesting a new page, the app is very slow to respond, then it's
> fine for the next few pages, then if you stop for a minute or so and request
> another page, you get the same sluggish response. This does not occur on
> win2003 server.
problems. No plans to even look at W2003, new sites are
getting Linux :)
> Is there a setting I have missed perhaps?It does sound like a caching 'problem'. Is it being paged
> is it IIS5 Vs IIS6? or something else?
out, and having to reloaded - i.e. what is the memory
situation.
I don't touch IIS either, Apache2 and PHP4 work fine with
FB1.0 and FB1.5, with a reasonable performance improvement
from 1.5, but nothing that I have 'bench marked'. Old stuff
will stay FB1.0, and all new stuff has only been FB1.5, so
real comparison is not practical ;)
--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services