Subject | Re: [Firebird-Java] Re: JayBird status |
---|---|
Author | Yves Glodt |
Post date | 2011-10-20T10:15:49Z |
On 20 October 2011 10:49, mirmalag <mirco.malaguti@...> wrote:
tracking system (a product my company sells) as MVC Java-Webapp, on top of
the existing Firebird Database of our ERP/CRM-Solution,
and I ran into no Jaybird-related issues. It runs smooth. I use Hibernate
with Tomcat connection pooling btw.
> Nice to meet you Roman and Mark,As a side note, I can tell you that I have built a medium-sized issue
> I can't presently dig into deep detail.
> What I know for sure is that we will use EntityBeans
> wherever possible. The platform uses Jta for transaction control.
> For the parts of the application that will require explicit SQL, I'm pretty
> confident that current feature set doesn't pose big problems.
> In fact the application is a rebuild of a current pure C/S one and the
> current database design will be modified as little as possible.
> I feel unsure about the parts of the new application that will be
> implemented using platform components that will use the database
> through standard protocols and methods.
> I'm already in the process of building confidence with JavaEE 6,
> a new beast for me, and interfacing the database is a delicate issue.
> It seems that the standard choice is MySql, for this kind of project.
> Fact is we have deep knowledge of Firebird and want to stay with it.
> But I don't know directly of other experiences in using Firebird as a
> JavaEE backend.
>
tracking system (a product my company sells) as MVC Java-Webapp, on top of
the existing Firebird Database of our ERP/CRM-Solution,
and I ran into no Jaybird-related issues. It runs smooth. I use Hibernate
with Tomcat connection pooling btw.
> We will build the trial environment soon, I hope, then be able to[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> come back with some result.
>
> Thank you,
> Mirco
>
> --- In Firebird-Java@yahoogroups.com, Mark Rotteveel <mark@...> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:48:00 +0200, Roman Rokytskyy <roman@...>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Mirco,
> > >
> > >> I'm requested to lead a JavaEE 6 project using JBoss AS 6 and
> > >> Firebird as a backend. Are the drivers feature complete or are there
> > >> unimplemented ones?
> > >> My boss want to be sure about any bump on the road, so I'm asking
> > >> here prior to set up a trial environment myself and any help is
> > >> really
> > >> appreciated.
> > >> Contributing the project is a viable option to ensure to reach the
> > >> project goal.
> > >
> > > Mark implemented JDBC 4.1 support (Java 7) and at the moment he is
> > > working on the release notes. I do not expect any additional API
> changes
> >
> > > before release. There is one open ticket JDBC-192, which has to be
> > > closed before release, but that's it.
> >
> > I implemented all methods to satisfy the interfaces, but most of the new
> > JDBC 4.1 features *will* throw SQLFeatureNotSupportedException; I however
> > believe that most of the methods added in JDBC 4.1 are relatively
> esoteric,
> > but for Jaybird 2.3 I will implement some of them and other optional JDBC
> > parts currently not supported.
> >
> > I hope to have a draft version of the release notes by next week, so we
> > might also want to prepare a release candidate.
> >
> > > Re. whether driver is feature complete... There are features in
> > > Firebird that are not fully supported by the driver (e.g. optimized
> wire
> >
> > > protocol support), however they will not be part of the v2.2 release
> > > anyway. So the task is rather to check whether everything you need is
> > > there.
> >
> > Mirco, could you give a bit more detail about which features you think
> you
> > will absolutely need?
> >
> > Mark
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>