Subject | Re: [Firebird-Java] Yet about (Jaybird 2.0.1 + JDBC 3.0) x 1.5.5 |
---|---|
Author | Roman Rokytskyy |
Post date | 2006-04-03T19:34:41Z |
> Then, I think the Jaybird default implementation isCan you can prove this or this is your way of thinking?
> CLOSE_CURSORS_AT_COMMIT, and all other JDBCs use
> HOLD_CURSORS_OVER_COMMIT by default, right?
Roman