|Subject||Re: [Firebird-Java] Proposal for FBDriver modification|
> It would be easy to solve problems with Connection's configurationsIn general this is a good idea. However it has at least one drawback - you
> as soon as it would be easy to plug in own Connections
> implementations into the driver.
improve the driver and do not contribute code back to the project and other
people will have to do the same job.
> What do you think of modifing FBDriver.java in such a manner:In general ok, but... FBManagedConnection and FBManagedConnectionFactory are
> That way it would be possible to inherit driver and replace
> connection factory with own one.
> Is it good idea, what do you think?
not designed to be inherited, many methods have package visibility, some
attributes are accessed directly, etc. If there is need to provide a way to
extend driver's JCA part, we should consider it for the future releases.
Also be aware that any extension should be released under LGPL.