Subject | Re: [Firebird-Java] [Slightly OT] Data Abstraction |
---|---|
Author | David Jencks |
Post date | 2003-04-24T02:51:34Z |
On 2003.04.22 14:18 Phil Shrimpton wrote:
I think that there have been improvements in optimistic locking, fk part of
pk handling, and jbossql.
Theres a working jsr-77 management interface.
david
> On Wednesday 16 April 2003 23:35, David Jencks wrote:The datasource configuration is much much simpler.
>
> Hi,
>
> > None of these solutions involve writing sql (unless you want to) or
> jdbc
> > code.
>
> I have no problems with writing SQL; in fact I prefer it for small stuff
> that
> uses a single, known DB, but once you umore than one DB server into the
> mix
> it becmes a maintenance nightmare.
>
> > If you decide against cmp2, I'd try jdo next.
>
> Looked at both Hibenate and JDO, and both look good. Hibenate looks
> especially promising. But although they are both 'simpler' than CMP2,
> they
> both have a learning curve, and we do have exisiting experience with
> CMP2, so
> it looks like CMP2 is the way we are going to go.
>
> Whist I have you attention <g>, is there any benifit, Firebird wise,
> using
> Jboss 3.2.x rather than 3.0.x? I am happy with 3.0.x, but have yet to
> find a
> 'whats new' list to see if I am missing anything in 3.2.x
I think that there have been improvements in optimistic locking, fk part of
pk handling, and jbossql.
Theres a working jsr-77 management interface.
david
>
> Phil
> --
> Linux 2.4.4-4GB
> 6:08pm up 6 days, 9:59, 1 user, load average: 0.58, 0.15, 0.04
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Firebird-Java-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>