Hi,

>have you done some select Tests ?

Sadly I havent had a chance to run select tests yet.

>Or is nothing changed that could impact select perfomance ?

The changes could affect select performance as much as insert performance.

Thanks
Ryan


-----Original Message-----
From: Carsten Schäfer [mailto:ca_schaefer@...]
Sent: 04 March 2003 10:48
To: Firebird-Java@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Firebird-Java] Class 2 driver modifications have 2x insert
performance over pure type 4 for many small inserts.


Hi,
have you done some select Tests ?
Or is nothing changed that could impact select perfomance ?

gruß
Carsten

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Baldwin" <ryan.baldwin@...>
To: <Firebird-Java@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 11:30 AM
Subject: [Firebird-Java] Class 2 driver modifications have 2x insert
performance over pure type 4 for many small inserts.


> Hi,
>
> When running some benchmarks on the type 2 driver modifications I came up
> with some interesting results. These show that when many small records are
> inserted the driver in type 2 mode performs alomost twice as quick as the
> pure type 4 driver. The numbers I got are:
>
> Type 4 Type 2
>
> Run#1 Run#1
> benchmarkPreparedInsert: 12628 benchmarkPreparedInsert: 6880
> benchmarkNonPreparedInsert: 10475 benchmarkNonPreparedInsert: 5398
> benchmarkBigBlobInsert: 16234 benchmarkBigBlobInsert: 10655
>
> Run#2 Run#2
> benchmarkPreparedInsert: 11246 benchmarkPreparedInsert: 6479
> benchmarkNonPreparedInsert: 9925 benchmarkNonPreparedInsert: 5117
> benchmarkBigBlobInsert: 15912 benchmarkBigBlobInsert: 10596
>
> Run#3 Run#3
> benchmarkPreparedInsert: 11286 benchmarkPreparedInsert: 6519
> benchmarkNonPreparedInsert: 9804 benchmarkNonPreparedInsert: 5098
> benchmarkBigBlobInsert: 16103 benchmarkBigBlobInsert: 10595
>
> In these tests records are inserted into a table looking like this:
>
> CREATE TABLE ATABLE (
> FIELD1 INTEGER NOT NULL,
> FIELD2 CHAR(16),
> FIELD3 VARCHAR(64) CHARACTER SET ISO8859_1 COLLATE EN_UK,
> FIELD4 VARCHAR(256) CHARACTER SET ISO8859_1 COLLATE EN_UK,
> FIELD5 BLOB SUB_TYPE 1,
> FIELD6 INTEGER,
> PRIMARY KEY (FIELD1) ) ;
>
> In each run 10000 records are inserted. In the first two the blob field is
> filed with very small blobs. On the last test the blob field is filled
with
> 1k blobs. When the blob field is filled with 50k blobs the numbers look
more
> like:
>
> Type 4
>
> Run#3 Run#3
> benchmarkPreparedInsert: 13510 benchmarkPreparedInsert: 6539
> benchmarkNonPreparedInsert: 10525 benchmarkNonPreparedInsert: 4997
> benchmarkBigBlobInsert: 258792 benchmarkBigBlobInsert: 217914
>
> Here the 50k blobs are only inserted in the last test. It shows that the
> type 2 modifications begin to loose there edge under these circumstances.
>
> I found these results interesting - if only that it shows how much room
> there might be for improvement in the type 4 jgds implementation as this
is
> all thats different between the versions.
>
> I was supprised by these numbers - I re-ran and re-checked the tests many
> times though.
>
> These tests were performed against firebird 1.0.0 on win2k on a p6 1.2Ghz.
>
> Thanks
> Ryan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Firebird-Java-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Firebird-Java-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/