Hello David

I have no problem with the lgpl license.

About the version I vote to create an RC1 version, and wait some time (for instance four weeks) until version 1.0. Because the
last version (beta1) was delivered some months ago, there is a lot of changes to be checked by the users that don't use CVS.

I don't have pending changes at this moment.

Regards

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Jencks" <davidjencks@...>
To: "Alejandro Arias" <alberola@...>; "Blas Somoza" <blas@...>; "firebird-java" <firebird-Java@yahoogroups.com>;
"Roman Rokytskyy" <rrokytskyy@...>
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 2:38 AM
Subject: [Firebird-Java] Change firebirdsql license to lgpl only? and, lets release next version.


> I'd like to change the firebirdsql driver license from dual mpl/lgpl to
> lgpl only. I have a hard time imagining this affecting anyones use of it
> except for stealing our code.
>
> I'm not entirely sure what we legally need (I might be able to just delete
> the mpl part according to its own terms) but I think all the contributors
> should agree on this, so if you have contributed code please respond.
>
> Note that the current version will remain in cvs under the current dual
> license, and the "lgpl only" will basically apply only to new work. I'll
> tag everything before changing the license.
>
> After we decide on this, does anyone have work they want to get in before
> we release the long awaited next version?
>
> Should we call it version 1.0 RC1 or just live on the edge and claim 1.0?
>
> Thanks
> david jencks
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Firebird-Java-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>