Wow!!!

Thanks!!!!

I'd like to also take a look at the autocommit again and see how hard it
would be to solve using multiple concurrent transactions. It might not be
as hard as I thought at first.

david jencks

On 2002.06.24 14:54:34 -0400 Blas Rodriguez Somoza wrote:
> Hello
>
> I was working on compliance and performance the last two months, I
> think now the work is finished with the exception of a
> performance issue in autocommit mode.
>
> I evaluate the driver compliance and performance with jDatamaster and
> the results are the following:
>
> 1.- The driver comply with JDBC except three non implemented methods.
> Interclient 2.01 fails in 161 tests.
> 2.- The Driver performs better than Interclient excluding inserts
> with autocommit. The difference is greater on remote
> connections.
>
> Until now the message about JCA-JDBC Driver is that it does implement
> JDBC less than Interclient, and that it performs worse the
> Interclient. Now we can say that JCA-JDBC implement JDBC much better than
> Interclient does and that excluding autocommit, the Driver
> performs better than Interclient.
>
> I have commited some changes to JDBC20_compliance.html, the
> performance tests are now included in the document.
>
> The only thing to be enhanced until version 1.0 is the performance in
> autocommit mode. Perhaps we reuse Fb transactions using
> commit_retaining. It will be great if the driver performs better than
> Interclient also in Autocommit mode.
>
> Regards
> Blas Rodriguez Somoza.
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Firebird-Java-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>