And nearly the same results as my tests show
(I would say 2,5 times slower with reading).
And all tests with database and java-appliction on the same machine.
So no network should slow something down.

gruse
Carsten

----- Original Message -----
From: "dctle2000" <dctle2000@...>
To: <Firebird-Java@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 6:01 PM
Subject: [Firebird-Java] Re: JCA-JDBC Performance


> That is basically the same result I am getting when I was testing JCA-
> JDBC about a month ago.
>
> Don.
>
> --- In Firebird-Java@y..., mebus@g... wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > we have made here some performance tests JCA-JDBC
> > > vs. InterClient. The results are very interesting.
> > >
> > > The differences we have on localhost are very
> > > small. JCA-JDBC is about 10% slower then InterClient.
> > > But having a remote connection writing with JCA-JDBC
> > > is horrible slow, while reading is about the same
> > > with InterClient again.
> >
> > Sorry! We have made a litle mistake! Writing is about 10%
> > slower with JCA-JDBC than with InterClient. Reading with
> > JCA-JDBC takes about twice the time of reading with
> > InterClient!
> >
Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>