I will try to look at this soon but can't promise anything. However, from
glancing quickly at your posts I don't understand what the motivation is
for these changes. Could you explain again why you want to make these
changes?

Many thanks for the improvements you already committed!

david jencks

On 2002.05.20 13:51:53 -0400 Blas Rodriguez Somoza wrote:
> Hello Roman
>
> I employ two more hours, finishing the work and testing the result,
> and I have now a working Driver with the proposal
> implemented and tested. So I need only oppinions/votes but no work. :-)
>
> The final package distribution is slightly different. I don't
> subclass statement classes because it is too complex and perhaps
> the wrong design choice. Whether it is clear why Connection must be
> subclassed, it is not clear for Statements.
>
> The AbstractConnection defines some abstract transaction methods,
> Statements does not need to implement transaction logic but
> only use the AbstractConnection methods. Finally I only subclass
> Connection and ConnectionHelper.
>
> The dependencies are the following
>
> - basicjdbc don't depend on firebirdsql.jca, firebirdsql.jdbc or
> javax.resource
> - jdbc dependencies on basicjdbc.
> FBConnection EXTENDS org.firebirdsql.basicjdbc.FBAbstractConnection
> FBConnectionHelper EXTENDS org.firebirdsql.basicjdbc.FBAbstractConnectionHelper
> FBConnection USES org.firebirdsql.basicjdbc.FBStatement
> - jca dependencies on basicjdbc.
> FBManagedConnection USES org.firebirdsql.basicjdbc.FBStatement
> FBManagedConnectionFactory USES org.firebirdsql.basicjdbc.FBStatement
> - jca and jdbc has several depencies as do now.
>
> All the internal and external tests passed OK excluded PoolingManager
> test, as happen before.
>
> Regards
> Blas Rodriguez Somoza
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "rrokytskyy" <rrokytskyy@...>
> To: <Firebird-Java@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 5:00 PM
> Subject: [Firebird-Java] Re: Jdbc 2.0 Patches
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > There is one proposal I want to make before the next beta was
> > > delivered, mainly because I have done the work to implement it on
> > > my local CVS copy. I'm now sending the proposal to the list. I
> > > think that with this proposal will be easier for an average user to
> > > understand and patch the driver, and doing so help in the
> > > development.
> >
> > Are you talking about your restructuring proposal? I will think about
> > it, but such refactoring requires a lot of time. I pretty sure that
> > we have to do refactoring sooner or later. But currently I hardly can
> > help you in this effort until end of June, maybe July. Also we need
> > support from David and Alejandro (I'm simply afraid to change
> > anything in jca, gds and jgds packages).
> >
> > David? Alejandro? Your comments?
> >
> > > Also I want to test the get/set methods before the final
> > > version but I don't know how many betas will be delivered. The tests
> > > and patches will take some time and it is better to wait for the
> > > beta 3.
> >
> > I think there will be more than 3 beta. Or 2 beta + more than one
> > release candidate :) There are some big open issues that should be
> > addressed, like driver performance, better callable statement
> > support, etc. So, I would prefer to stay in endless beta that is
> > stable than to release unstable version.
> >
> > > Finally I must commit a little document about JDBC support,
> > > but I will do it today.
> >
> > Documentation is something we're definitely missing here... Thanks a
> > lot!
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Roman Rokytskyy
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > Firebird-Java-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Firebird-Java-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>