Subject | Re: What open issues do you have? |
---|---|
Author | Roman Rokytskyy |
Post date | 2002-11-12T20:29:25Z |
Nickolay,
Can you describe your usage scenarios? Do you use DataSource
implementation? Do you use JCA implementation?
Best regards,
Roman Rokytskyy
Can you describe your usage scenarios? Do you use DataSource
implementation? Do you use JCA implementation?
Best regards,
Roman Rokytskyy
--- In Firebird-Java@y..., Nickolay Samofatov <skidder@b...> wrote:
> Hello Roman,
>
> Could you implement customizable user-defined TPB mapping ? Almost
nobody
> of our client base are statisfied by current mapping and we have to
distribute
> patched driver. Firebird-specific public interface to set TPB
mapping
> or ability to pass mapping through connection parameters would be
enough.
> I can implement it myself but will you accept my patch ?
>
> The most popular mapping among our clients (there are ~15 distinct
> development groups at installation sites working with Jaybird
driver) is:
> SERIALIZABLE - isc_tpb_concurrency
> READ COMMITED -
isc_tpb_read_commited+isc_tpb_rec_version+isc_tpb_nowait
> (external utilities developers)
> or isc_tpb_read_commited+isc_tpb_no_rec_version+isc_tpb_wait
> (application server components developers)
>
> Nobody uses REPEATABLE_READ because Oracle compatibility is a
> concern for us and it doesn't support it (the same thing as with
> Firebird that doesn't support it too - it has no mode where phantom
> rows are present but repeatable read is possible).
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Nickolay mailto:skidder@b...