Subject | Re: JDBC Development |
---|---|
Author | alberola@bio.es |
Post date | 2001-04-27T09:09:19Z |
Hi,
I have read the IBDI list and I know that firebirdsql.org have
been registered to Firebird community.
So, I think that your naming convetion is all right.
What do you thing about the following:
org.firebirdsql.gds ---> General Interface
org.firebirdsql.jgds ---> Java implementation of GDS
org.firebirdsql.ngds ---> JNI implementation of GDS
Now, I am working in GDS and JGDS and I will be able to
commit a GDS interface in a few days. That will allow
everybody to develop a NGDS in a compatible fashion with
JGDS.
Any ideas ?
Bye.
Alejandro Alberola.
I have read the IBDI list and I know that firebirdsql.org have
been registered to Firebird community.
So, I think that your naming convetion is all right.
What do you thing about the following:
org.firebirdsql.gds ---> General Interface
org.firebirdsql.jgds ---> Java implementation of GDS
org.firebirdsql.ngds ---> JNI implementation of GDS
Now, I am working in GDS and JGDS and I will be able to
commit a GDS interface in a few days. That will allow
everybody to develop a NGDS in a compatible fashion with
JGDS.
Any ideas ?
Bye.
Alejandro Alberola.
--- In IB-Java@y..., David Jencks <davidjencks@e...> wrote:
>
> I have used the naming convention like this:
>
> java.sql.Array interface >> org.firebirdsql.jdbc.FBArray
>
>