Subject | Re: [IB-Java] CVS? |
---|---|
Author | Dave Warnock |
Post date | 2001-04-24T17:13:26Z |
Jim,
Just because Sun does not follow the guidelines is not a very good
reason not to do so ourselves.
I am loath to start work using a domain name we don't own. That is why I
suggested firebirdsql (I realise that firebird.sql is nicer for a sql
driver but...).
I would also like to be sure we have package namespace available for
other java work inside firebird. So how about
org.firebirdsql.jdbc
org.firebirdsql.jdbc.metadata
org.firebirdsql.jdbc.server3050
or if you really really really hate the org. at the front then we could
drop it and use
firebirdsql.jdbc
firebirdsql.jdbc.metadata
firebirdsql.jdbc.server3050
But personally I don't see much cost in the org. at the front and I
like the fact it emphasises the org instead of a comwhich is cool for a
free software tool.
Dave
Just because Sun does not follow the guidelines is not a very good
reason not to do so ourselves.
I am loath to start work using a domain name we don't own. That is why I
suggested firebirdsql (I realise that firebird.sql is nicer for a sql
driver but...).
I would also like to be sure we have package namespace available for
other java work inside firebird. So how about
org.firebirdsql.jdbc
org.firebirdsql.jdbc.metadata
org.firebirdsql.jdbc.server3050
or if you really really really hate the org. at the front then we could
drop it and use
firebirdsql.jdbc
firebirdsql.jdbc.metadata
firebirdsql.jdbc.server3050
But personally I don't see much cost in the org. at the front and I
like the fact it emphasises the org instead of a comwhich is cool for a
free software tool.
Dave
> While these are clearly correct according to what Sun says, it
> doesn't correspond to what Sun does. Might we consider:
>
> firebird.sql
> firebird.sql.metadata
> firebird.sql.server3050