At 04:03 PM 4/24/01 +0100, Ian Newby wrote:

>
> What version of JDBC should we target? 3.0 is in final draft now. Does

anyone

> lower level first to
> I've downloaded the 3.0 API and it
> looks nice and complex! I thought JDBC was supposed to be a simple, clean
> method for accessing databases!
>

Since there are proper supersets, there really isn't a question.
We first do 1.0. Then we do 2.0. Then, if we care, we do 3.0.
It probably does make sense to make the classes implement the
3.0 interfaces even if all the new stuff dead ends with
"throw new SQLException ("not yet implemented")".

Jim Starkey