> > In this case you can consider InterServer as a part of InterBase.
> >
>
> Are you quite sure about this? I just did a search for the
> string "localhost" in the 2.0 interserver and found nothing.
>
> It appears that Interserver is properly layered on the standard
> API, so other than possible problems of bitching about the
> format of the URL, double indirect is certainly feasible. Perhaps
> a small patch may be required to handle a node name on the
> database string.

No, I am not sure about anything. Right now I installed InterServer on
a clean w2k machine and tried to run it. It did not start:

"The dynamic link library gds32.dll could not be found..."
that's exactly what I meant: It wants to have Interbase installed on the
same
box.
Please, tell me, how I can install the 2 boxes system: 1 machine listen
almost everything (httpd:80,jsp:8080,interserver:3060,rmiregistry:1099) and
another one has only Interbase:3050 and database itself


Alexander

>
> > One obvious disadvantage of this is that if we want to access the

database

> > using an untrusted applet we have to keep whole chain
> > (webserver:80, interserver:3060 interbase:3050) on the same machine

which is

> > not
> > an excellent idea in term of security.
> >
>
> No untrusted applet doing access to an Interbase database is
> secure or could be made secure in the next year or more. Put
> your database behind a fire wall.
>
> Jim Starkey
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> IB-Java-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>