Subject | Re: [IB-Java] Unmanaged scenario |
---|---|
Author | Massimo Ferrari |
Post date | 2001-11-13T08:50:14Z |
> Well, now I'm agreeing with you more ;-)wow!! :)
> I'm reluctantly coming to the conclusion that to make the driverthat would be nice
> jca-compliant we have to fix this so autocommit = true if no other
> transaction control has happened.
> This is probably a good idea too. I think perhaps the best solution isproperties
> another DataSource class that you can set the properties on (the
> now in ManagedConnectionFactory) and that will create and set up theYes, good idea
> ManagedConnectionFactory, and make the ManagedConnectionFactory use it for
> its DataSource.
> What I don't want to see happen is the jca architecture compromised tothat must absolutely not happen, and that's not what I was pointing out
> support the Driver class.
about the actual implementation state.
> Adding conveniences such as the javabeanWell, I would like to say 'I'll do it', but actually my understanding of the
> DataSource that do not obstruct the jca framework is not a problem for me.
> (Not sure when I might do it, but even I might write it if I get a little
> free time ;-)
whole is still too poor, but maybe some time ...
Thank you
Massimo