Subject Re: Support for Tablespaces/Data-placement in Firebird?
Author plinehan
"Leyne, Sean" <Sean@...> wrote:


> There are a number of hardware solutions which have made the
> need for such "hot" management a thing of the past.


> Those solutions are:

> - PCIe SSDs (97000 Read and 32000 Write random 4 KB IO/s)!!!
> - SATA SSDs (35000 Read and 3300 Write random 4 KB IO/s)!
> - Battery backup cached disk controllers (some with 4GB of
> write cache)
> - disk controllers with up to 128GB of SSD based Read cache
> - increases in RAM supported in servers to 256GB



Hmmm.... my question would then be, exactly how many Firebird
servers run on that sort of hardware? I would respectfully
suggest very few - RAID arrays for some, maybe.


> I would argue that "hot" management is another feature
> which Oracle/MS DBAs use to justify their jobs.


Well, part of my question was about whether the code was there
in the original IB6.0 release? As I said, I have memories of
it being mentioned - it would be a "nice to have" and it
wouldn't just be performance - selective backups for example?
Read only tablespaces? It could be an option for advanced
users while maintaining the current configuration as the
default - it's just an idea that struck me. Performance will
not be an issue for me with my "briedcase" type app.

Rgs.


Paul...



> Sean