Subject | RE: [Firebird-general] Updating FB2.1.2 download |
---|---|
Author | Roger Vellacott |
Post date | 2009-06-12T11:44:16Z |
I have the snapshot, and it solves the problem. It just seemed a bit
weird to us that the only way we can have a stable version of FB is to
use what, (cf Helen's reply), is an untested, and therefore potentially
unstable, snapshot build, which was loaded to the website only 7 days
after the official release.
So from our point of view, the official, stable release is unstable.
And the unofficial, unstable release is stable. I thought someone might
want to do something about this.
Roger Vellacott
Passfield Data Systems Ltd
From: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Claudio
Valderrama C.
Sent: 12 June 2009 12:36
To: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Firebird-general] Updating FB2.1.2 download
Vellacott
C.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
weird to us that the only way we can have a stable version of FB is to
use what, (cf Helen's reply), is an untested, and therefore potentially
unstable, snapshot build, which was loaded to the website only 7 days
after the official release.
So from our point of view, the official, stable release is unstable.
And the unofficial, unstable release is stable. I thought someone might
want to do something about this.
Roger Vellacott
Passfield Data Systems Ltd
From: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Claudio
Valderrama C.
Sent: 12 June 2009 12:36
To: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Firebird-general] Updating FB2.1.2 download
> -----Original Message-----<mailto:Firebird-general%40yahoogroups.com>
> From: Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Firebird-general%40yahoogroups.com> ] On Behalf Of Roger
Vellacott
> Sent: Viernes, 12 de Junio de 2009 7:12Did you want a snapshot or a full release?
>
> OK Helen, I withdraw the suggestion. I don't want to mess around with
> FB's very cautious release process, which is obviously a good thing.
>
> I guess it is a very obscure bug, requiring a peculiar combination of
> absurdly large numbers and certain PSQL operations, and in
> our apps only
> arises as the result of the user's data entry errors, so it's up to us
> to avoid it.
C.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]