Subject | Re: Oracle buys Sun |
---|---|
Author | tjelvare |
Post date | 2009-04-30T11:56:15Z |
I'm mainly developing web-applications and sites under php and with the new VPS-technology taking ground, mysql is consequently not the only option (as compared to most shared-hosting-plans).
There's technical benefits of using fb over mysql, one obvious is ram-requirements.
(The quickey to run a mysql under vps is disabling innodb and sometimes even table-lock)
The effect/integrity of running fb under vsp/san with/without forced-writes maby
should be looked into.
Mysql shouldn't be taken for granted as no1 on the internet, things change. ;-)
atb
//t
There's technical benefits of using fb over mysql, one obvious is ram-requirements.
(The quickey to run a mysql under vps is disabling innodb and sometimes even table-lock)
The effect/integrity of running fb under vsp/san with/without forced-writes maby
should be looked into.
Mysql shouldn't be taken for granted as no1 on the internet, things change. ;-)
atb
//t
--- In Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com, "Tommi Prami" <groups.tprami@...> wrote:
>
> > I'd say that nobody here cares about destiny of MySQL or depends on
> > Sun. How all this can affect Firebird?
>
> I believe this can be very positive for Firebird. Especially if Oracle
> continues to commercialize MySQL ever further than it is currently.
>
> Just a hunch...
>
> -TP-
>