Subject | Re: [Firebird-general] Does Firebird needs a new logo? |
---|---|
Author | Doug Chamberlin |
Post date | 2009-11-23T16:58:30Z |
Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
Also, wholesale replacement of a logo should almost never be done.
But sometimes an update is very helpful. The last revision of the
Firebird logo was a huge improvement and I think most everyone
appreciated it.
Another good example is the retro Mozilla monster which has largely been
replaced with separate project/product logos. It looked so childish.
--
Doug C.
-----
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> Just to make things clear: I have no problems with the currently logo.I agree.
> I even like it, and my vote was to keep it :)
Also, wholesale replacement of a logo should almost never be done.
But sometimes an update is very helpful. The last revision of the
Firebird logo was a huge improvement and I think most everyone
appreciated it.
Another good example is the retro Mozilla monster which has largely been
replaced with separate project/product logos. It looked so childish.
--
Doug C.
-----
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?