> http://wiki.firebirdsql.org/

Anyone else want to express opinion on that? Gave mine in a previous
post. Personally, I don't know what to do with that.

Quicklist of anti-patterns:
- "Contributors will have to register so that we can control input
into the wiki."
- Page security
- Categories
- Minor save
- 8pt fonts
- lack of focus, irrelevant links all over
etc. etc.

... wikis just don't work that way... checkout c2.com for comparison.

PS: How can the tiki wiki engine be extended?