Subject | Re: Firebird architectures and scalable applications |
---|---|
Author | Doru Ilasi |
Post date | 2005-07-01T10:06:15Z |
We build an becaming ERP for romanian market and we start small &
scalable database, go bigger on superserver as we deploy with embbed
for small & personal use. I think is the case matching the subject.
Please let us know if we can be usefull in any way to you'r subject.
Best regards,
Doru
--- In Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com, "Ann W. Harrison"
<aharrison@i...> wrote:
scalable database, go bigger on superserver as we deploy with embbed
for small & personal use. I think is the case matching the subject.
Please let us know if we can be usefull in any way to you'r subject.
Best regards,
Doru
--- In Firebird-general@yahoogroups.com, "Ann W. Harrison"
<aharrison@i...> wrote:
> Hello all,different
>
>
> I've had a talk accepted for the O'Reilly Open Source Conference in
> Portland Oregon (USA) August 2-5. Now I've got to write it. The topic
> is Firebird configurations, by which I mean embedded, classic, &
> SuperServer - with a dash of Vulcan to be added. The point I want to
> make is that many applications start small and grow - I suppose others
> start medium sized and become personal, or provide read-only CD support.
> I want to justify our different configurations both as serving
> types of applications and as serving scalable applications. If you've
> built (or are planning) a application that takes advantage of different
> configurations, I'd like to hear about it.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Ann