marius popa wrote:

> Best article i have read in this week / month
>
> ps:
> Where i work we reached the limits of cvs very fast (for example
> distributed cvs servers) and i know it tells the truth.

It seems that Tom Lord is king of the ploy.
The fact the CVS may be so bad doesn't mean that Arch is brilliant nor that
it's much better than Subversion.
Atomic commits make sense in some cases, but in others I don't like the idea
of being forced to commit everything.
Also, Tom could speak a bit about stability in his product. There isn't
agreement that he got a really superior solution.

C.