Subject | RE: [Firebird-general] Logo work continues |
---|---|
Author | Nigel Weeks |
Post date | 2003-07-01T00:52:23Z |
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Chamberlin [mailto:YahooGroups@...]
Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 10:39
To: nigel@...
Subject: Re: [Firebird-general] Logo work continues
I'd like to see examples without the "Enterprise RDBMS" since I don't think
Firebird is an enterprise RDBMS. It is more a departmental RDBMS because it
lacks security, scalability, incremental backup, etc. which an enterprise
product needs.
-----------------------------
I think these are issues that need serious addressing.
I always thought it was being built as an Oracle equivalent?
It sure runs as fast as it.
What do people think of the issues:
Security?
Scalability?
Incremental Backup?
Will it ever be considered an 'Enterprise RDBMS'? I sure hope so!
From: Doug Chamberlin [mailto:YahooGroups@...]
Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 10:39
To: nigel@...
Subject: Re: [Firebird-general] Logo work continues
I'd like to see examples without the "Enterprise RDBMS" since I don't think
Firebird is an enterprise RDBMS. It is more a departmental RDBMS because it
lacks security, scalability, incremental backup, etc. which an enterprise
product needs.
-----------------------------
I think these are issues that need serious addressing.
I always thought it was being built as an Oracle equivalent?
It sure runs as fast as it.
What do people think of the issues:
Security?
Scalability?
Incremental Backup?
Will it ever be considered an 'Enterprise RDBMS'? I sure hope so!