Subject | Re: [Firebird-general] W3C wants the Web to be a big [xml?] "database" |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2003-05-08T06:00:20Z |
Everything about XQuery and stuff like that is weak...
www.dbdebunk.com
:)
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - the developer tool for InterBase & Firebird
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
See you at the First European Firebird Conference in May in Fulda, Germany
http://www.firebird-conference.com
working group."
documents can start to look like parts of one massive database."
database, or a large document at best). The foundation is very weak indeed .
www.dbdebunk.com
:)
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - the developer tool for InterBase & Firebird
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
See you at the First European Firebird Conference in May in Fulda, Germany
http://www.firebird-conference.com
> A very strange article about xml "databases"behave more like a relational database falls to the organisation's XML Query
> http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2134390,00.html
>
> "The W3C recommends XML for structuring data, and the task of making XML
working group."
>documents that provide the technical answer to that question, so that XML
> What do they mean by "behave" like a relational database ?
> It's relational or NOT,just keep it simple .
>
> "The XML Query working group has been putting together a framework of
documents can start to look like parts of one massive database."
>.(I may be cynical and say that : they start looking like a huge tree
> The crazyness continue, the documents start looking like a huge "database"
database, or a large document at best). The foundation is very weak indeed .