Subject | Re: [IBDI] Re: New Name for IBConsole fork... |
---|---|
Author | Marcos Vinicius |
Post date | 2002-04-15T12:25:21Z |
See, the major problem I think is dependency. IBO was not yet working on
Linux, then any app that depends on will be waiting. Thus, if we have to
use this components, IBX already runs on Linux/Kylix.
Dufloth.
Helen Borrie wrote:
Linux, then any app that depends on will be waiting. Thus, if we have to
use this components, IBX already runs on Linux/Kylix.
Dufloth.
Helen Borrie wrote:
>At 08:56 AM 15-04-02 -0300, you wrote:
>
>>IMHO, I think that we must have an new IBConsole version, using direct
>>api calls, running in both Windows and Linux. The use of components,
>>like IBO and IBX make a strong dependency and I don't like this. And,
>>using API directly will make an faster code, or I'm wrong?
>>
>
>IBO, IBX and FIBPlus *do* use the API directly. If you are talking about
>performance, bad API apps are slow, better API apps are faster.
>
>If you are talking about development time, working with existing classes
>that already know what to do must be faster than writing everything from
>scratch...
>
>Helen
>
>All for Open and Open for All
>Firebird Open SQL Database · http://firebirdsql.org ·
>http://users.tpg.com.au/helebor/
>_______________________________________________________
>
>
>Community email addresses:
> Post message: IBDI@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: IBDI-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: IBDI-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: IBDI-owner@yahoogroups.com
>
>Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.yahoogroups.com/community/IBDI
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>