Greeting:

This is a very caustic reply. It is not appreciated. I went to the
link which Helen
posted and read various pieces of information. There was no indication
in what I read that
it was based on IBX.

> Unlike machines, people with normal IQ have the natural ability to interpret
> phrases beyond the literal meaning. Maybe you have this capability turned
> off by default? Also, people have the ability to work in the context of
> previous conversations, whether written or spoken. Do you miss that
> "feature", too? I'm forced to ask given your assertion about IBX/IB in a
> thread that was about IBX/FB compatibility as stated in the subject. I think
> that for anyone it's clear that Helen wanted to say:
>
> "if you are determined to work with IBX, contribute your efforts to Toni
> Martir's IBAccess project" [that's based on IBX]. Helen omitted the words
> between square brackets. This feature could be called "human auto-complete".
> I don't know what was your original point, nitpicking, wasting bandwidth,
> fight boredom?
>
> You can see this for yourself in this source file that's part of IBAccess.
> Since you use IBX, you can tell whether the names after the "includes"
> clause are for IBX or not.
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ibaccess/ibaccess/ibaccess/al
> tergenerator.pas?rev=1.2&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup