Subject | DIVERTED :: Re[2]: Why Red Hat didnt got IB instead of PostGreSQL ? |
---|---|
Author | Carlos H. Cantu by way of Helen Borrie |
Post date | 2001-06-29T10:39Z |
Hummm... thanks Ann, I share the same opnion...
[]s
Carlos
WarmBoot Informatica - http://www.warmboot.com.br
Interbase-BR - http://www.interbase-br.com
AWH> At 12:07 PM 6/28/2001 -0300, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
AWH> huge battle around it. Everybody agrees that nobody really owns
AWH> PostgreSQL, which is better (from Red Hat's perspective) than
AWH> trying to deal with something that two groups claim to own.
AWH> Regards,
AWH> Ann
AWH> www.ibphoenix.com
AWH> We have answers.
[]s
Carlos
WarmBoot Informatica - http://www.warmboot.com.br
Interbase-BR - http://www.interbase-br.com
AWH> At 12:07 PM 6/28/2001 -0300, Carlos H. Cantu wrote:
>>If you dont know what I'm talking about, take a look at the links inAWH> PostgreSQL has wider name recognition and doesn't come with a
>>IBPhoenix start page (www.ibphoenix.com).
AWH> huge battle around it. Everybody agrees that nobody really owns
AWH> PostgreSQL, which is better (from Red Hat's perspective) than
AWH> trying to deal with something that two groups claim to own.
AWH> Regards,
AWH> Ann
AWH> www.ibphoenix.com
AWH> We have answers.