Subject | Re: [IBDI] ODBC? |
---|---|
Author | Adam Clarke |
Post date | 2000-08-08T01:02:47Z |
According to previous posts on this list regarding the reason for the BBW
pulling his CVS the payment he demanded from Inprise was not monetary but
instead the release of the IB documentation and testing suite.
I don't know if it is true but I believe this came from sources 'close' to
the wolf. Perhaps someone should at least try to contact him before going
ahead?
Cheers
Adam
pulling his CVS the payment he demanded from Inprise was not monetary but
instead the release of the IB documentation and testing suite.
I don't know if it is true but I believe this came from sources 'close' to
the wolf. Perhaps someone should at least try to contact him before going
ahead?
Cheers
Adam
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randal W. Carpenter" <wade@...>
To: <IBDI@egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: [IBDI] ODBC?
> Well now that I read forward and saw his terms, I agree with them...except
> that the BBW can't hardly not release something he already released I dont
> think (though Dale might). I feel that he has every right to hold out for
> the release of the docs and the test suite...but I think as long as we are
> willing to go to the pains to build this ourselves we can use it. I think
> however that his being upset at Inprise should not end up in us being
> punished as apposed to Borland. I would like to see him paid too, after
> all I would like to be able to thoroughly test my builds also. I would
> however like to see this resolved so I dont have to fool with building
> this on every platform I use...a binary release would be nice, but for now
> I am gonna build it if she will compile.
>
> Randal
>
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Tim Uckun wrote:
>
> > At 05:44 PM 08/07/2000 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> > >And I of course went and got it back then and still have it...seems to
me
> > >that it was released already...looks like to me that is was jerked off
the
> > >shelf as soon as word was that Borland was keeping the code and
shafting
> > >newcorp. So is it that he is waiting to be paid or is it that its be
> > >retracted until he can be paid...is that not the pot calling the kettle
> > >black as we were allowed to see it and now we are not due to policy
> > >changes?