Subject | Re: [IBDI] ODBC? |
---|---|
Author | Randal W. Carpenter |
Post date | 2000-08-07T23:17:08Z |
Well now that I read forward and saw his terms, I agree with them...except
that the BBW can't hardly not release something he already released I dont
think (though Dale might). I feel that he has every right to hold out for
the release of the docs and the test suite...but I think as long as we are
willing to go to the pains to build this ourselves we can use it. I think
however that his being upset at Inprise should not end up in us being
punished as apposed to Borland. I would like to see him paid too, after
all I would like to be able to thoroughly test my builds also. I would
however like to see this resolved so I dont have to fool with building
this on every platform I use...a binary release would be nice, but for now
I am gonna build it if she will compile.
Randal
that the BBW can't hardly not release something he already released I dont
think (though Dale might). I feel that he has every right to hold out for
the release of the docs and the test suite...but I think as long as we are
willing to go to the pains to build this ourselves we can use it. I think
however that his being upset at Inprise should not end up in us being
punished as apposed to Borland. I would like to see him paid too, after
all I would like to be able to thoroughly test my builds also. I would
however like to see this resolved so I dont have to fool with building
this on every platform I use...a binary release would be nice, but for now
I am gonna build it if she will compile.
Randal
On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Tim Uckun wrote:
> At 05:44 PM 08/07/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >And I of course went and got it back then and still have it...seems to me
> >that it was released already...looks like to me that is was jerked off the
> >shelf as soon as word was that Borland was keeping the code and shafting
> >newcorp. So is it that he is waiting to be paid or is it that its be
> >retracted until he can be paid...is that not the pot calling the kettle
> >black as we were allowed to see it and now we are not due to policy
> >changes?
>
>
> According to the code it's released under the IPL so I don't see how it
> can be "retracted". Just because BBW is in hibernation it does not mean he
> is planning on retracting anything. Here is the license from main.cpp.
> Looks like we're good to go. Thanks for putting up the CVS.
>
> /*
> * The contents of this file are subject to the Interbase Public License
> * Version 1.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except
> * in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
> * http://www.Interbase.com/IPL/
> * Software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" basis,
> * WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License
> * for the specific language governing rights and limitations under the
> License.
> * The Original Code was created by Interbase Software Corp. and its
> successors.
> *
> * Portions created by InterBase Software Corporation are Copyright (C)
> 1998-1999
> * Copyright (C) 2000 InterBase Software Corporation
> * All Rights Reserved.
> */
>
>
>
> :wq
> Tim Uckun
> Due Diligence Inc. http://www.diligence.com/ Americas Background
> Investigation Expert.
> If your company isn't doing background checks, maybe you haven't considered
> the risks of a bad hire.
>
>
>
>
> Community email addresses:
> Post message: IBDI@onelist.com
> Subscribe: IBDI-subscribe@onelist.com
> Unsubscribe: IBDI-unsubscribe@onelist.com
> List owner: IBDI-owner@onelist.com
>
> Shortcut URL to this page:
> http://www.onelist.com/community/IBDI
>