Subject | Re: [IBDI] Source under NDA |
---|---|
Author | Daniel_Work@nemmco.com.au |
Post date | 2000-03-13T00:16:55Z |
I agree with helen second point
misconception amoung many misconceptions.
But I disagree with her first "Caveats"
involved with getting the source to release standard.
The more I think about a private release the more I think it is essental.
Every hour it is delayed is an hour missed in which the IB communitity
could be building momentum for a running start when the source is released.
IMHO
Daniel Work
>>2. IMMENSE one of convincing people that Inprise isn't stalling withsome
>>sinister intent to renege on the open-sourcingthere is lots of stuff on SlashDot that shows this is not an uncommon
misconception amoung many misconceptions.
But I disagree with her first "Caveats"
>>1. It will have to be pretty private until the infrastructure for openumpteen
>>source development is in place, otherwise IB6 could start life with
>>out-of-control forksbecause one or two half baked forks might help us work out the issues
involved with getting the source to release standard.
>>I expect there are other issues...like code control/checkout facilitiesand
>>access to the tools for that.The private release should be just text files.
The more I think about a private release the more I think it is essental.
Every hour it is delayed is an hour missed in which the IB communitity
could be building momentum for a running start when the source is released.
IMHO
Daniel Work