Subject | Re: [IBDI] IB & Windows ME |
---|---|
Author | Ann Harrison |
Post date | 2000-10-09T02:23:46Z |
At 09:19 PM 10/8/2000 +0000, Lawrence Green wrote:
to complain about the situation... err... problem. Having
stifled my first inclination which is to ask, "why Windows ME,
do you have a death wish?", let me ask, "Do you have any idea
whether the problem is CPU overload, or disk?"
It's vaguely possible that Windows ME makes incremental memory
allocation very expensive - InterBase does a lot of that in
initializing the server. The other possibility, really slow
I/O would probably cripple the uSoft products... though it may
be that the relatively small reads (1K-8K) are pessimized.
Regards,
ann
>Is this just me, or is someone else having this problem.Not from first hand experience, but you are not the first person
>Ever since installing Windows ME, Interbase takes 10 to 15 minutes to
>start inialize, ether from IB SQL or from within a Delphi
>Application. The first draw to the database take 10 to 15 minutes.
>Anyone know anything about this?
to complain about the situation... err... problem. Having
stifled my first inclination which is to ask, "why Windows ME,
do you have a death wish?", let me ask, "Do you have any idea
whether the problem is CPU overload, or disk?"
It's vaguely possible that Windows ME makes incremental memory
allocation very expensive - InterBase does a lot of that in
initializing the server. The other possibility, really slow
I/O would probably cripple the uSoft products... though it may
be that the relatively small reads (1K-8K) are pessimized.
Regards,
ann