Subject Re: [Firebird-Architect] RE: Firebird beeing inconsistent in regards to accepting UDFs?
Author Lester Caine
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> My usual problem here is having moved to new hardware the correct UDF
>> >gets missed. That is often these days because the new hardware is Linux and the
>> >old Windows, so I am having to change the UDF entry anyway, and the database is
>> >not in an unusable state, just some queries fail to work which is often why I
>> >find the problem
> If you declare UDF module without path and extension, the declaration will be valid on
> any OS.

New set-ups have that luxury, and in reality I am doing that tidy as we go. The
distribution normally has both builds of udf so I can link to the right one ...
but if the link is wrong we get the same problem ;)

Lester Caine - G8HFL
Contact -
L.S.Caine Electronic Services -
EnquirySolve -
Model Engineers Digital Workshop -
Rainbow Digital Media -