Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:

>> My usual problem here is having moved to new hardware the correct UDF
>> >gets missed. That is often these days because the new hardware is Linux and the
>> >old Windows, so I am having to change the UDF entry anyway, and the database is
>> >not in an unusable state, just some queries fail to work which is often why I
>> >find the problem
> If you declare UDF module without path and extension, the declaration will be valid on
> any OS.

New set-ups have that luxury, and in reality I am doing that tidy as we go. The
distribution normally has both builds of udf so I can link to the right one ...
but if the link is wrong we get the same problem ;)

--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk