Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] RE: Firebird beeing inconsistent in regards to accepting UDFs? |
---|---|
Author | Dimitry Sibiryakov |
Post date | 2014-02-14T10:37:44Z |
14.02.2014 11:35, Lester Caine wrote:
any OS.
--
WBR, SD.
> My usual problem here is having moved to new hardware the correct UDFIf you declare UDF module without path and extension, the declaration will be valid on
> gets missed. That is often these days because the new hardware is Linux and the
> old Windows, so I am having to change the UDF entry anyway, and the database is
> not in an unusable state, just some queries fail to work which is often why I
> find the problem
any OS.
--
WBR, SD.