08.11.2010 17:19, Alex Peshkoff wrote:

> On 11/08/10 19:16, Jim Starkey wrote:
>> On 11/8/2010 11:13 AM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>>> 08.11.2010 16:32, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>>>> Sorry - may be we can start with line encryption? :)
>>> One question: should the line encryption work after SQZ, before SQZ or instead of
>>> SQZ?.. The latter one seem to have some advantages...
>>>
>> Sorry, there's been some confusion in terms. By "line encryption" I
>> mean communication line at the protocol level.
>
> Just to make sure - I too.

Oops, I was sure that it means record-level encryption.

--
SY, SD.