On 11/08/10 19:16, Jim Starkey wrote:

> On 11/8/2010 11:13 AM, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>> 08.11.2010 16:32, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
>>> Sorry - may be we can start with line encryption? :)
>> One question: should the line encryption work after SQZ, before SQZ or instead of
>> SQZ?.. The latter one seem to have some advantages...
>>
> Sorry, there's been some confusion in terms. By "line encryption" I
> mean communication line at the protocol level.

Just to make sure - I too.