Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Question about limits in fb 2.5 or 3.0 |
---|---|
Author | Alex Peshkov |
Post date | 2009-02-26T07:52:52Z |
On Thursday 26 February 2009 02:17, Jim Starkey wrote:
old code to follow this rule - do not think it's a good idea. Much better way
to do it at the same time with converting that part of code to C++ classes.
> Has anyone considered changing to new style symbol names? NoMost of new code is written using exactly this style. What about reworking all
> underscores, initial low case letter for variables, initial upper case
> letter for classes and structs, all caps for macros?
old code to follow this rule - do not think it's a good idea. Much better way
to do it at the same time with converting that part of code to C++ classes.
> Most of the Firebird external names were defined when Unix linkers onlyCan't say that it's well seen in current sources :))
> supported 6? 8? 9? character symbols.