On Thursday 31 January 2008 12:42, Nando Dessena wrote:

> Alex,
>
> A> On Thursday 31 January 2008 11:14, marius popa wrote:
> >> > Can you provide a list of functions you suggest?
> >>
> >> or another way would be to use ibpp.org
>
> A> Sorry, we need not ++only API.
>
> libdbi, as suggested in the part of the message you haven't quoted, is
> plain C, and from a quick glance it looks decent to me.

Because I only wanted to say that IBPP is wrong candidat to choose functions
for API extencion.

> What I don't
> understand is why people can't just use what they need instead of
> expecting the Firebird Project to endorse it all and make it
> "official". Looks like a waste of resources to me.

Generally yes, but when people say - we want functions in existing API
like 'isc_expand_dpb()' (i.e. helper functions, not absolutely needed, but
making use of API more comfortable), this seems reasonable. I only want
someone who wants such functions to publish a list of what is wanted to make
it possible to discuss it here.