|Subject||Re: [Firebird-Architect] Exec. statement parameters|
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 12:56, Roman Rokytskyy wrote:
> >> What about the VBA syntax? :)Seems to be so :)
> >> EXECUTE STATEMENT S (a:=CURRENT_TRANSACTION, b:=CURRENT_CONNECTION);
> > I suggested this syntax for named SP arguments.
> > There was no agreement but no strong objections either AFAIR. :-)
> Well, no strong objections in FB-Architect list is an agreement, isn't
> it? :)))