Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Exec. statement parameters |
---|---|
Author | Roman Rokytskyy |
Post date | 2007-12-12T09:56:06Z |
>> What about the VBA syntax? :)Well, no strong objections in FB-Architect list is an agreement, isn't
>>
>> EXECUTE STATEMENT S (a:=CURRENT_TRANSACTION, b:=CURRENT_CONNECTION);
> I suggested this syntax for named SP arguments.
>
> There was no agreement but no strong objections either AFAIR. :-)
it? :)))
Roman