Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Database triggers |
---|---|
Author | Jonathan Neve |
Post date | 2006-09-20T19:23:58Z |
Ann W. Harrison wrote:
Along the same lines, is there any reason why it would not be possible
to add custom fields to a system table? Perhaps there is, I don't know
the internals too well, just wondering... If it isn't technically
absurd, it might be an interesting proposition, as tool vendors would
then be able to easily attach bits of information directly to the
meta-data without having to create a separate table duplicating a lot of
data.
--
Best regards,
Jonathan Neve
_______________
CopyTiger - advanced database replicator for Interbase/Firebird!
Web : http://www.microtec.fr/copycat/ct
_______________________________________
CopyCat - database replication components for Delphi/C++Builder!
Web : http://www.microtec.fr/copycat/cc
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Martijn Tonies wrote:That would be quite nice!
>
>>> Can you think of any reason why a developer would create a trigger on
>>> the RDB$Database table?
>>>
>> Well, given that triggers on system table don't "stick", no.
>>
>>
>
> That could be fixed. It's really a gbak problem / quirk.
>
Along the same lines, is there any reason why it would not be possible
to add custom fields to a system table? Perhaps there is, I don't know
the internals too well, just wondering... If it isn't technically
absurd, it might be an interesting proposition, as tool vendors would
then be able to easily attach bits of information directly to the
meta-data without having to create a separate table duplicating a lot of
data.
--
Best regards,
Jonathan Neve
_______________
CopyTiger - advanced database replicator for Interbase/Firebird!
Web : http://www.microtec.fr/copycat/ct
_______________________________________
CopyCat - database replication components for Delphi/C++Builder!
Web : http://www.microtec.fr/copycat/cc
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]