Subject | Re: [Firebird-Architect] Design of new built-in functions |
---|---|
Author | Adriano dos Santos Fernandes |
Post date | 2006-05-06T15:46:26Z |
Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
thing.
Some SDFs have different syntax than UDFs and that will be a problem.
Adriano
> My vote goes to (2), as otherwise we'll have undefined behaviour - someI agree with (2) and don't consider overriding of SDFs by UDFs as good
> functions (new ones) can be overriden by UDFs whilst others cannot (old
> ones). As soon as we move away from BLR, we could reconsider this behaviour
> and allow UDFs to override all SDFs.
>
thing.
Some SDFs have different syntax than UDFs and that will be a problem.
Adriano