Jim Starkey wrote:

>
> I hope, however, that the second engine to
> attach to the lock table will notice an incompatible lock table format
> version and give a polite error message (hint: If there isn't one now,
> this a good time to add one).

You're correct here, that's exactly what I missed. Thanks for the
pointer. If really bad things are not possible, then I'm much less
worried about the configuration issue.


Dmitry