Dmitry Yemanov wrote:

> Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>
>> What about put in the providers the necessary functions of
>> fb_lock_print, and fb_lock_print calls it?
>>
>
> This looks like a good solution. In would also allow fb_lock_print to
> work in the clustered environment (provided that the engine can query
> the DLM about the lock data).
>
>

If you have a distributed lock manager, you don't need lock print.