Dmitry Yemanov wrote:

>"Jim Starkey" <jas@...> wrote:
>
>
>>I don't think that would be difficult to fix.
>>
>>
>
>Adjust dependent BLRs? I'd be interested to know how.
>
>
>
>

If we were to extend the types of message objects internally (trivial
after EVL has been recast as a type hierarchy), we could bypass the
existing fixed length messages with something much more like the Vulcan
ValueSet without hard coded types.


--

Jim Starkey
Netfrastructure, Inc.
978 526-1376