Dmitry Yemanov wrote:

>"Ann W. Harrison" <aharrison@...> wrote:
>
>
>>a procedure created when a field was a string should continue to work
>>even if that field was changed to something else. As above, if the
>>change goes from a less restrictive type to a more restrictive type,
>>then give conversion errors.
>>
>>
>
>For changed dependency fields, it works. For procedure parameters - it
>doesn't, as we get a message format mismatch.
>
>
>

I don't think that would be difficult to fix.

--

Jim Starkey
Netfrastructure, Inc.
978 526-1376