> A better way to handle this would be to define your procedure as:
>
> public static void someProcedure (Connection connect, int valueA,
> String valueB)
> {
> }
>
> If you do it this way, anyone can call the procedure with a connection
> object an expect it to work.

Yep, the only problem is that this is non-standard. So, the previous
case has to be supported too.

Roman